will stop allowing voice traffic to a few selected locales in North America, where we determine that “traffic stimulation” practices are going on. Therefore, effective today, we are making the following changes to our voice product terms and conditions and acceptable use policy:Ī), Inc. Thus, we refuse to do nothing and put our customers or our own business in jeopardy to what we, and many others, believe to be inappropriate practices that exist to take advantage of regulatory loopholes. and other VoIP providers incur to deliver an unlimited nationwide VoIP product will inevitably raise your telecom rates as we try to continue to stay profitable and viable. If you are an Unlimited SIP trunk, BoxSet or Phonebooth customer, your bill will not be affected now. That free conference calling service that you thought was saving you money would actually cost you significant money on your phone bill. ![]() you are charged per minute), you will be subject to excessively high cost per-minute charges for calls into those rural areas of concern. So, how does this affect you if nothing is done? If you are a metered SIP trunk customer (i.e. ![]() The problem is compounded because, while the FCC may not look kindly on these practices, thus far, there has not been the timely relief we think is needed to protect those being unfairly charged. In our view, this whole practice greatly distorts what would otherwise be a low volume of calls to a given rural area into a high volume calling area, resulting in unfair and excessive charges to others. In fact, the “free” service is not really free since the telecom provider then turns around and charges the communications companies that send them the long distance “stimulated” calls from around the country for connecting to the service. In our view, these so-called “services” exist for no reason other than to draw high-volume traffic to high-cost tariff areas. This practice has been the subject of great controversy within the telecommunications industry and among VoIP providers like, Inc., and has drawn the recent formal scrutiny of both the FCC and the State of Iowa Utilities Board. In fact, the charges are so high that the telecom providers have an arrangement where their conference calling or adult entertainment service partners share in the profits. Long distance calls to the phone numbers of these services is usually directed to rural areas where the telecom providers assess charges for the calls that we view as excessive, if not exorbitant. However, we want you to know that the viability of low-cost IP telephony is at risk due to highly controversial so-called “traffic-stimulation” activities of some telecom providers and their business partners through the promotion and use of “free” conference calling or similar services, or “free” adult entertainment and “chat” services. ![]() As an interconnected VoIP and communications service provider, we have grown rapidly because our business customers are routinely saving 30-70% off of their traditional telecom bills. our SIP trunking, BoxSet and Phonebooth voice-over-IP products have been recognized as being a great value for customers. I have attached a letter from our VP explaining the reason behind blocking these calls.Īt, Inc. "Unfortunately that number’s area code and prefix is blocked due to a change in ’s Acceptable Use Policy. Here is a link that explains it a little better: Essential the only solution is to use a different conference provider that is NOT doing the “traffic stimulation” thing. Below is the entire text of the reply they sent me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |